Mode conversion in a capillary taper#
A changing bore changes the local mode profiles. Expressing the pulse in those profiles introduces a connection that transfers amplitude between modes, even in a linear, lossless calculation. The worked comparison shows its effect and separates taper and wall contributions. The connection is derived in the varying coherent-wall model and is also used without a wall.
The taper coupling without a wall#
The connection belongs to the moving basis, not to the wall, so a multimode capillary taper without a wall carries it too, by default. One reason this matters: a lossless capillary is often used as a simple model of a low-loss antiresonant fibre, and a small-core taper of such a fibre must be able to convert between modes. In the true-power amplitude of the local modes the equation is
the walled generator with the wall term \(H\) zero, except that \(B\) is each channel’s
own propagation constant \(\beta_n = n_{\rm eff}\,\omega/c\) — the Marcatili index of
whatever model= and loss= the modes declare, lossless or not — rather than the wall
block’s paraxial condensation of it, so that with \(C\) dropped the flow propagates
exactly what the adiabatic route propagates. The assembly is the varying wall’s: the
cumulative \(\Phi\) carries the lowest channel for every channel, the flow’s diagonal the
rest, \(\overline{i(\beta_n - \beta_1)}\) (zero for the lowest channel) with each
channel’s normalisation term, frozen per section of the operator’s own table with the
variation and \(\sqrt{w_n/w_m}\,C_{mn}\) in the explicit residual. It applies to the
contiguous \(\mathrm{HE}_{11}\) to \(\mathrm{HE}_{1N}\) set of plain capillary modes,
\(N \ge 2\), whose radius varies
(taper_coupling_block()); a pressure gradient moves no
mode shape and needs none. taper_coupling=False on
prop_capillary(),
prop_waveguide(),
from_capillary() and
from_waveguide() is the explicit opt-out
to the adiabatic route; beside a wall it is refused, because the wall carries the
connection. The coupling is refused by name, with the opt-out named in the message, on
an envelope grid (the coupled flow is tabulated on a field grid’s increasing frequency
axis), beside a second field component or a noise model, and for a radius profile
without an analytic slope. The record’s modal.flow.model is "taper coupling", with
the flow’s certificate rows and no wall ratios, so a coupled run is not resumed as an
adiabatic one.
These comparisons illustrate the model’s accuracy and the need to converge the retained mode set:
The adiabatic limit. A slow lossless taper (30 to 29 µm over a millimetre) converts within the Dyson remainder of the first-order coupled-mode amplitude and below its integration-by-parts (Love-type) bound, and its \(\mathrm{HE}_{11}\) is the adiabatic route’s to the same remainder, phase included.
Power conservation. The lossless flow conserves \(\sum|b_m|^2\) to its step error, converging at fourth order or better.
A finite-element solution. Against an independent scalar paraxial finite-element solution of the tapered bore in mapped coordinates — a 125 to 62.5 µm taper over 1 cm and over 10 cm between 5 mm straight ends, lossless, at 800 nm, launched in \(\mathrm{HE}_{11}\) — twenty channels reproduce the energy in every channel holding more than \(10^{-3}\) of it to 0.22 % (1 cm, where 36 % of the energy leaves \(\mathrm{HE}_{11}\)) and 0.016 % (10 cm, where 0.27 % does), every weaker channel to \(5\times10^{-7}\) of the launch, and the total power to \(2\times10^{-9}\). Eight channels are too few for the 1 cm taper, and at 400 nm, where the conversion reaches further up the ladder, thirty are needed.
The backends.
numba_cpuand the native backend run it within the flow-parity bounds, and a lossless multimode taper runs onbackend="auto".
A strongly lossy taper at the default step bound. The coupling carries each
channel’s loss inside its block, and with the default dz_max of half the length the
flow’s conditioning guard can refuse a strongly lossy multimode taper. The refusal says
to cap dz_max, or to pass taper_coupling=False for the adiabatic route.